Eyelit Technologies
Request Demo

Best MES Software for Medical Device Manufacturing (2026)

Last Update: October 16, 2026

The best MES software for medical device manufacturing depends on how a manufacturer creates, approves, and traces its production records. For medical device manufacturing, this guide assesses manufacturing execution system (MES) platforms against five capabilities that commonly matter when building controlled electronic production records:

  • An electronic production record for every device, lot, or batch: the electronic device history record (eDHR).
  • Electronic signatures and audit trails designed to support 21 CFR Part 11 requirements.
  • Genealogy from each finished device back to component lots and serial numbers.
  • Controlled labeling and the production data behind Unique Device Identification (UDI).
  • Validation documentation that can reduce the work required from the manufacturer’s validation team.

Ten platforms are compared: Eyelit Technologies, Siemens Opcenter, SAP Digital Manufacturing, Tulip, Critical Manufacturing, Dassault Systèmes DELMIA Apriso, MasterControl, Rockwell Automation Plex MES, AVEVA, and Aegis FactoryLogix. Eyelit Technologies publishes this guide and is evaluated on the same criteria as every other vendor. For the cross-industry view, see our comparison of the 10 best MES software platforms for manufacturers.

Which MES software is best for medical device manufacturers?

For medical device manufacturers that need electronic device history records, Part 11 electronic signatures, component-level genealogy, controlled labeling, and validation documentation, Eyelit Technologies’ Eyelit MES documents capabilities in all five areas. Based on those documented capabilities, Eyelit MES is a platform worth evaluating for manufacturers with those priorities. The ten platforms below are compared on the same five areas, using each vendor’s own published materials.

Four factors narrow the shortlist:

  • how much of the device history record is still on paper;
  • how deep traceability must go, from finished device to component lot;
  • how much validation effort the quality team can take on;
  • which ERP, PLM, and quality systems the MES must connect to.

Shortlist at a glance

Platform What its published materials describe
Eyelit MES (Eyelit Technologies) eDHR under 21 CFR Part 11 and Part 820, multi-level genealogy, controlled label management, and validation documentation with each release
Siemens Opcenter A dedicated medical device and diagnostics edition with automatically generated, self-auditing eDHRs and eBRs
SAP Digital Manufacturing Cloud execution on SAP Business Technology Platform, coordinated with planning and logistics
Tulip A no-code, composable MES with eDHRs, automated audit trails, and electronic signatures
Critical Manufacturing eDHR and eBR, genealogy at unit level, UDI tracking, and automated validation
DELMIA Apriso Manufacturing operations connected to PLM and ERP, with built-in quality management
MasterControl Built-in eDHR with review by exception
Rockwell Automation Plex MES Pre-configured for discrete, CPG, and regulated industries, with end-to-end traceability
AVEVA Batch-oriented production with material tracking for traceability investigations
Aegis FactoryLogix A complete eDHR for every completed device, component-level traceability, and Part 11 electronic signatures

Capability comparison

Vendor Electronic device history records Electronic signatures and audit trails Traceability and genealogy Validation support Integration
Eyelit Technologies Eyelit MES: eDHR for medical device manufacturers under 21 CFR Part 11 and 21 CFR Part 820 Eyelit MES: line-item and whole-record approval with secure e-signatures; immutable record structure Eyelit MES: multi-level genealogy across serial, lot, batch, kit, and sub-assembly, forward and backward in one action Eyelit MES: Functional Design Specification with test scripts and trace matrices; OQ and PQ templates Eyelit MES: one point of integration for ERP, order entry, and PLM
Siemens Opcenter Their materials describe automatically generated, self-auditing eDHRs and eBRs Their materials describe self-auditing records; e-signatures not identified in reviewed vendor materials Their materials describe capturing all information associated with as-built production records Not identified in reviewed vendor materials Their materials describe integration of product design, engineering, and manufacturing
SAP Digital Manufacturing Not identified in reviewed vendor materials Not identified in reviewed vendor materials Not identified in reviewed vendor materials Not identified in reviewed vendor materials Their materials describe execution coordinated with planning and logistics, on SAP Business Technology Platform
Tulip Their materials describe digitized eDHRs and eBRs Their materials describe automated audit trails and regulation-compliant electronic signatures Their materials describe end-to-end traceability Their materials describe access controls, audit trails, and documentation that speeds validation Their materials describe connectors for ERP, PLM, and QMS
Critical Manufacturing Their materials describe searchable, self-auditing electronic DHRs and batch records Their materials describe electronic signatures, and state that the system exceeds 21 CFR Parts 11 and 820 Their materials describe genealogy at batch, lot, or unit level, and UDI tracking Their materials describe automated validation procedures and templates for each qualification phase Their materials describe bi-directional ERP integration and BOM import from ERP or PLM
DELMIA Apriso Not identified in reviewed vendor materials Not identified in reviewed vendor materials Their materials describe product traceability Not identified in reviewed vendor materials Their materials describe connection to PLM and ERP
MasterControl Their materials describe built-in eDHR with review by exception Not identified in reviewed vendor materials Their materials describe connected digital records that support traceability Not identified in reviewed vendor materials Their materials describe integration with ERP and LIMS
Rockwell Automation Plex MES Not identified in reviewed vendor materials Not identified in reviewed vendor materials Their materials describe end-to-end inventory traceability from receipt to shipment, including WIP Not identified in reviewed vendor materials Their materials describe tight connection to ERP
AVEVA Not identified in reviewed vendor materials Not identified in reviewed vendor materials Their materials describe tracking the transformation of materials into finished products Not identified in reviewed vendor materials Their materials describe exchange of planning and results data with business applications
Aegis FactoryLogix Their materials describe a complete eDHR for any completed device Their materials describe electronic signatures on every approval and process step, for 21 CFR Part 11 Their materials describe traceability to the individual component and its manufacturer lot, capturing UDI identifiers Their materials describe a GAMP Category 4 configurable system with test plans supplied on request Not identified in reviewed vendor materials

“Not identified in reviewed vendor materials” means the vendor pages reviewed for this comparison did not describe the capability. It does not mean the product lacks it. Sources for every row are listed under each vendor below and at the end of this page.

How were these platforms compared?

This is a documentation-based comparison, not a hands-on product benchmark. Each platform is assessed on five points:

  • electronic device history records;
  • electronic signatures and audit trails;
  • traceability and genealogy;
  • validation support;
  • integration with ERP, PLM, and quality systems.

Statements about other vendors come only from that vendor’s own published materials, reviewed 8 October 2026. We did not test the products for this comparison.

How do FDA requirements shape MES selection for medical devices?

FDA requirements establish expectations for controlled production and quality records. FDA does not require manufacturers to use an MES. An MES can provide the electronic infrastructure for creating and maintaining those records as production happens, rather than assembling them afterward.

Three sets of rules shape MES requirements:

  • 21 CFR Part 820 (QMSR). The Quality Management System Regulation took effect on 2 February 2026. It amends Part 820 to incorporate ISO 13485:2016 by reference. The device history record (DHR) is no longer a named term in the regulation, but the record requirement continues as production records under ISO 13485. Most manufacturers and vendors still call the electronic version an eDHR.
  • 21 CFR Part 11. Part 11 sets the conditions under which FDA treats electronic records and electronic signatures as equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures, including audit trails and signature controls.
  • Unique Device Identification (UDI). FDA’s UDI rules require most device labels to carry a unique device identifier. A UDI identifies the device and can include production identifiers such as the lot or batch number, serial number, manufacturing date, or expiration date, where applicable. An MES can help keep the production data used in those identifiers controlled and traceable.

What is an electronic device history record (eDHR)?

An electronic device history record (eDHR) is the digital production record for a device, lot, or batch. It shows what was built, from which components, by whom, on which equipment, against which version of the process, and with what inspection results. An MES builds the eDHR step by step as production runs. Paper travelers, by contrast, are collected and reviewed at the end.

Eyelit MES supports Electronic Device History Records (eDHR) for medical device manufacturers under 21 CFR Part 11 and 21 CFR Part 820: electronic records, e-signature requirements, validation documentation, and audit trails.

Eyelit MES holds history records in an immutable record structure, designed so that entries cannot be altered after signature.

What should medical device manufacturers look for in an MES?

These five questions cover the capabilities compared above. Each comes with a test to run on your own process during the demo.

1. Can the MES create a complete electronic device history record (eDHR)?

Partial digitization leaves the hardest part, reconciling paper with screens, on the quality team’s desk. Ask each vendor to run one device from first operation to release with no paper at any step, then show the finished record as an auditor would see it.

Eyelit MES lets manufacturers digitize device and controlled history records while remaining compliant, removing paper and manual processes.

2. Does the MES support compliant electronic signatures and audit trails?

Part 11 expects each signature to be linked to the signer, the time, and the meaning of the signature, and records to keep an audit trail of changes. Have the vendor approve a single line item, then the whole record, and show the audit trail for both.

Eyelit MES supports line-item and whole-record approval by authorized users using secure e-signatures.

3. Does the MES provide end-to-end component and product genealogy?

A supplier issue or a field complaint has to be traced to every affected device, quickly and in both directions. In the demo, take one component lot and ask for every finished device that contains it. Then reverse the query.

Eyelit MES provides multi-level tracking and genealogy across serial, lot, batch, kit, and sub-assembly, traceable forward and backward in a single action. For more on how this works in practice, see medical device traceability on the shop floor.

Device labels carry UDI production identifiers, so label content has to match the production record. Find out how a label layout is approved and versioned, and how printed labels are reconciled against the record.

Eyelit MES provides controlled label management: graphical layout, data, and validation approved in one system with e-signatures, version control on every change, and label reconciliation records retained for audit.

5. What validation evidence comes with the MES?

An MES used in a regulated plant has to be validated, and the work comes back with each release. Find out which validation documents ship with each release, and which ones the quality team has to write itself.

Eyelit MES releases ship with compliance documentation — a Functional Design Specification with test scripts, trace matrices, and supporting evidence — and with OQ and PQ template documentation.

Eyelit MES for medical device manufacturing

Eyelit MES covers each of the five criteria in this comparison with documented capabilities: eDHR under Part 11 and Part 820, line-item and whole-record electronic signatures, multi-level genealogy, controlled label management, and validation documentation with each release. It also runs assembly and batch steps on one model, which matters in plants where batch steps such as sterilization or curing sit inside device routings.

Eyelit MES supports discrete, batch, or combined discrete-and-batch manufacturing on the same model.

Process changes reach the floor under the same controls as the records.

Eyelit MES version control distinguishes major from minor changes, tracked against individual build products, approved by authorized personnel via e-signature with full change traceability recorded.

Nucleus Research named Eyelit Technologies a Leader in its Manufacturing Execution System Technology Value Matrix 2026, published 11 August 2026. Read the Nucleus Research MES Technology Value Matrix 2026.

Source: eyelit.com/manufacturing-execution-system/

Disclosure: Eyelit Technologies publishes this guide.

Siemens Opcenter for medical device manufacturing

Siemens describes Opcenter Execution Medical Device and Diagnostics as a medtech MES that automatically generates electronic device history records and electronic batch records, and supports rapid changeovers for smaller batch or lot sizes.

Source: siemens.com/en-us/products/opcenter/execution/medical-device

SAP Digital Manufacturing for medical device manufacturing

SAP describes SAP Digital Manufacturing as a cloud execution platform on SAP Business Technology Platform, with execution coordinated with planning and logistics.

Source: sap.com/products/scm/digital-manufacturing.html

Tulip for medical device manufacturing

According to Tulip’s materials, its composable MES for medical devices is a no-code platform for digitizing eDHRs, with automated audit trails and electronic signatures.

Source: tulip.co/solutions/composable-mes-for-medical-devices

Critical Manufacturing for medical device manufacturing

Critical Manufacturing describes its MES for medical devices as supporting paperless manufacturing with eDHR and eBR, genealogy at batch, lot, or unit level, and UDI tracking.

Source: criticalmanufacturing.com/industries/medical-device-manufacturing/

Dassault Systèmes DELMIA Apriso for medical device manufacturing

Dassault Systèmes describes DELMIA Apriso as connecting manufacturing with PLM and ERP, with built-in quality management.

Source: 3ds.com/products/delmia/apriso

MasterControl for medical device manufacturing

MasterControl markets Manufacturing Excellence to medical device manufacturers as an MES with built-in eDHR and review by exception.

Source: mastercontrol.com/manufacturing/mes-software-solution/medical-device

Rockwell Automation Plex MES for medical device manufacturing

Rockwell Automation describes Plex MES as pre-configured for discrete, CPG, and regulated industries, with end-to-end traceability and closed-loop quality control.

Source: plex.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/products/manufacturing-execution-system.html

AVEVA for medical device manufacturing

AVEVA’s materials present AVEVA Manufacturing Execution System as suited to batch-oriented production, with material tracking for traceability investigations.

Source: aveva.com/en/products/manufacturing-execution-system/

Aegis FactoryLogix for medical device manufacturing

Aegis Software describes FactoryLogix as generating a complete eDHR for any completed device, with component-level traceability and electronic signatures for 21 CFR Part 11.

Source: aiscorp.com/industries/medical-devices

How does MES connect to production scheduling in medical device plants?

MES records what happened on the floor, and the schedule sets what runs next. In medical device plants, holds, inspections, and batch steps such as sterilization change capacity daily. The schedule needs that data as it happens.

Eyelit MES and Eyelit APS run a continuous feedback loop: real-time WIP, downtime, and shop-floor changes pass from MES to APS, and updated schedules return to MES.

For the planning side, see our comparison of the 10 best APS software platforms.

Frequently asked questions

Do medical device manufacturers need an eDHR?

FDA requires production records for every device or batch, but does not require them to be electronic. An eDHR is the electronic form of that record. Manufacturers move to eDHR to remove transcription errors, review records as production runs, and find records quickly during audits and investigations. Electronic records then fall under 21 CFR Part 11.

What changed with the QMSR in 2026?

The Quality Management System Regulation took effect on 2 February 2026 and amended 21 CFR Part 820 to incorporate ISO 13485:2016 by reference. FDA also replaced its QSIT inspection approach with a new inspection program. Terms such as device history record are no longer defined in the regulation, but the requirement for production records continues under ISO 13485.

What is the difference between an MES and a QMS for medical devices?

An MES runs and records production on the shop floor: work instructions, materials, equipment, and the device history record. A quality management system (QMS) manages the wider quality processes, such as document control, CAPA, complaints, and audits. Medical device manufacturers usually run both and connect them, so quality events on the floor reach the QMS.

What is review by exception?

Review by exception means the quality team reviews only the steps that went outside defined limits, instead of every line of every record. It depends on an MES that enforces each step and flags deviations as they happen. Routine steps can then be released without line-by-line review.

Sources

All statements about vendors other than Eyelit Technologies are drawn from the vendor-published pages below, reviewed 8 October 2026.

Resources

Related Resources

All resources
Manufacturing Execution System (MES)Biomerics Goes Live with Eyelit MES for Paperless eDHRsMedical device manufacturer eliminates paper-based Device History Records, cutting documentation time from two weeks to real time while strengthening audit readiness. Holmdel, NJ – October 15, 2026 – Biomerics, a leading contract manufacturer of medical devices, has completed an extensive validation...Read more Sales Inventory and Operations Planning (SIOP)Why ETO and CTO manufacturers still plan in spreadsheets, and what to plan insteadPart 1 of 3: Planning what you haven’t designed yet Put an S&OP manager from an engineer-to-order (ETO) or configure-to-order…Read more Manufacturing Execution System (MES)What an MES Actually Does, and What It Doesn’tMost manufacturers who go live with a manufacturing execution system (MES) expect it to deliver results on its own. Eighteen months later, many are still waiting. The question worth asking isn’t whether the software works. It’s whether the organization around it was set up to use what it shows. What...Read more Agent EyeQWhite Paper – AI Based Production Orchestration Redefines the Manufacturing Applications PlatformManufacturing execution system (MES) adoption continues to expand as manufacturers respond to labor constraints, supply chain volatility....Read more